Factores perioperatorios, inmunidad y recurrencia del cáncer / Perioperative factors, immunity and cancer recurrence

Introducción: Los criterios de calidad en la cirugía oncológica radical se basan en la extirpación completa del tumor, con márgenes libres, sin enfermedad macroscópica residual, con una linfadenectomía adecuada y mínima manipulación tumoral posible. A pesar de conseguir estos objetivos, puede quedar enfermedad residual no visible o micrometástasis, con potencial de crecimiento y diseminación dependiendo de la capacidad tumoral y de las defensas del huésped. Objetivos: Evaluar la influencia de los factores perioperatorios sobre la inmunidad del paciente oncológico intervenido quirúrgicamente y el efecto potencial de los fármacos anestésicos en la recurrencia, así como otros factores perioperatorios que pueden afectar la diseminación tumoral a largo plazo. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica electrónica de los artículos de los últimos 10 años que cumplieran con el objetivo trazado. Desarrollo: Durante el periodo perioperatorio la activación de la respuesta al estrés quirúrgico desencadena una serie de reacciones neuroendocrinas, humorales e inmunitarias complejas. La cirugía, con indudable potencial curativo, se relaciona con un estado de inmunosupresión por activación del eje HPA (hipotálamo- hipofisario- adrenal) y la inflamación. Por otro lado, la anestesia produce cambios biomoleculares que afectan la inmunidad celular y el número de NK (natural killer), que puede influir en la recurrencia del cáncer a largo plazo. Conclusiones: Disminuir el estrés quirúrgico y el psicológico, controlar el dolor quirúrgico, mantener normotermia, y una juiciosa transfusión sanguínea, además una técnica anestésica con disminución del consumo de opiáceos, puede resultar favorecedora para proteger la respuesta inmune antimetastásica del organismo y puede tener un efecto benéfico en la enfermedad oncológica(AU)

Introduction: The quality criteria in radical oncological surgery are based on complete tumor removal, with free margins, without residual macroscopic disease, with adequate lymphadenectomy and minimal possible tumor manipulation. Despite achieving these objectives, non-visible residual disease or micrometastasis may remain, likely to grow and spread depending on tumor capacity and the host's defenses. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of perioperative factors on the immunity of cancer patients operated on and the potential effect of anesthetic drugs on recurrence, as well as other perioperative factors that may affect long-term tumor spread. Methods: An electronic bibliographic search was carried out of the articles published in the last ten years and that fulfilled the established objective. Development: During the perioperative period, activation of the response to surgical stress triggers a series of complex neuroendocrine, humoral and immune reactions. Surgery, with unquestionable curative potential, is related to a state of immunosuppression due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and inflammation. On the other hand, anesthesia produces biomolecular changes that affect cellular immunity and the number of natural killers, which can influence cancer recurrence in the long term. Conclusions: To reduce surgical and psychological stress, to control surgical pain, to maintain normothermia, and a judicious blood transfusion, in addition to an anesthetic technique with reduced opiates usage, can be beneficial to protect the body's antimetastatic immune response and can have a beneficial effect on oncological disease(AU)

Perioperatorio y recurrencia oncológica: reto actual en la práctica anestésica / Perioperative and cancer relapse: a challenge in current anesthetic practice

Introducción: El cáncer es la segunda causa de muerte en el mundo y en Cuba. Su estrategia de tratamiento implica fármacos oncoespecíficos y cirugía; y diariamente aumentan los pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente lo que conlleva a un periodo perioperatorio y la administración de múltiples medicamentos anestésicos. Objetivo: Describir los principales factores relacionados con la anestesia que, durante el perioperatorio, influyen en la recurrencia oncológica. Desarrollo: El estrés quirúrgico y la anestesia general, con la subsecuente respuesta neuroendocrina e inflamatoria, por sí mismos, limitan la respuesta inmune y alteran el balance entre el potencial metastásico del tumor y antimetastásico de las defensas, lo cual representa un mecanismo plausible en el incremento de las metástasis y recurrencia oncológica. Conclusiones: La proliferación del cáncer y recidiva tumoral en el contexto quirúrgico asociado a la anestesia, es un tema relativamente nuevo y por tanto es necesario realizar estudios con mayor alcance que validen este fenómeno. No obstante, el efecto inmunosupresor que produce el estrés perioperatorio, fármacos anestésicos como opioides y halogenados pueden ser la clave para explicar este fenómeno. La anestesia general endovenosa total libre de opioides y adecuada analgesia regional contribuyen a disminuir este efecto(AU)

Introduction: Cancer is the second cause of death worldwide and in Cuba. Its treatment strategy involves oncospecific drugs and surgery. Every day, the number of patients who undergo surgery increases, which leads to a perioperative period and the administration of multiple anesthetic medications. Objective: To describe the main factors related to anesthesia and that, during the perioperative period, influence oncological recurrence. Development: Surgical stress and general anesthesia, with the subsequent neuroendocrine and inflammatory response, by themselves, limit the immune response and alter the balance between the metastatic potential of the tumor and the antimetastatic defense, which represents a plausible mechanism for increased metastasis and oncological relapse. Conclusions: The proliferation of cancer and tumor relapse in the surgical context associated with anesthesia is a relatively new issue and it is therefore necessary to carry out studies with greater scope that validate this phenomenon. However, the immunosuppressive effect produced by perioperative stress, as well as anesthetic drugs such as opioids and halogenated drugs, can be the key to explaining this phenomenon. Total intravenous opioid-free general anesthesia and adequate regional analgesia contribute to diminish this effect(AU)

Posterior quadratus lumborum block for primary total hip arthroplasty analgesia: a comparative study / Bloqueio anestésico do quadrado lombar posterior para analgesia na artroplastia total do quadril primária: estudo comparativo

ABSTRACT Objective To compare analgesia and opioid consumption for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block with patients who did not receive quadratus lumborum block. Methods The medical records of patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty between January 1st, 2017 and March 31, 2018 were reviewed, and 238 patients were included in the study. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative, post anesthesia care unit, and 48-hour opioid consumption, postoperative pain Visual Analog Scale scores, and post-anesthesia care unit length of stay. Primary and secondary endpoint data were compared between patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block with patients who did not receive quadratus lumborum block. Results For the patients who received quadratus lumborum block, the 24-hour total oral morphine equivalent (milligram) requirements were lower (53.82mg±37.41), compared to the patients who did not receive quadratus lumborum block (77.59mL±58.42), with p=0.0011. Opioid requirements were consistently lower for the patients who received quadratus lumborum block at each additional assessment time point up to 48 hours. Pain Visual Analog Scale scores were lower up to 12 hours after surgery for the patients who received a posterior quadratus lumborum block, and the post-anesthesia care unit length of stay was shorter for the patients who received quadratus lumborum block. Conclusion Preoperative posterior quadratus lumborum block for primary total hip arthroplasty is associated with decreased opioid requirements up to 48 hours, decreased Visual Analog Scale pain scores up to 12 hours, and shorter post-anesthesia care unit length of stay. Level of evidence: III

RESUMO Objetivo Comparar a analgesia e o uso de opioides em pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total do quadril primária com bloqueio pré-operatório do quadrado lombar posterior e pacientes que não receberam o bloqueio do quadrado lombar. Métodos Revisamos os prontuários de pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total do quadril unilateral entre 1º de janeiro de 2017 e 31 de março de 2018, e 238 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. O desfecho primário foi o consumo de opioides no pós-operatório nas primeiras 24 horas. Os desfechos secundários foram consumo de opioide no intraoperatório, na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e nas primeiras 48 horas, escores de Escala Visual Analógica de dor pós-operatória, e tempo de permanência na recuperação pós-anestésica. Os desfechos primário e secundários foram comparados entre os pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total do quadril primária com bloqueio pré-operatório do quadrado lombar posterior e aqueles que não receberam o bloqueio do quadrado lombar. Resultados Para o grupo que recebeu o bloqueio, as doses totais de morfina por via oral em 24 horas foram menores (53,82mg±37,41) em comparação ao grupo sem bloqueio (77,59mg±58,42), com p=0,0011. A utilização de opioides foi consistentemente menor para o grupo que recebeu o bloqueio em cada tempo adicional de avaliação até 48 horas. Os escores da Escala Visual Analógica até 12 horas após a cirurgia para os pacientes que receberam o bloqueio do quadrado lombar posterior e o tempo de permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foram menores para o grupo que recebeu o bloqueio. Conclusão O bloqueio anestésico do quadrado lombar posterior para artroplastia total do quadril primária está associado à diminuição do uso de opioides nas primeiras 48 horas, diminuição do escore de dor da Escala Visual Analógica em até 12 horas, e menor tempo de permanência na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica. Nível de evidência: III

Stages and factors of the "perioperative process": points in common with the aeronautical industry / Etapas e fatores do "processo perioperatório": pontos em comum com a indústria aeronáutica

ABSTRACT Background: The aeronautical industry is one of the disciplines that most use control systems. Its purpose is to avoid accidents and return safer flights. The flight of an airplane, from its takeoff to its landing is a process divided into stages under strict control. A surgical procedure has the same characteristics. We try to identify and develop the stages of the surgical process using the experience of the aviation industry in order to optimize the results and reduce surgical complications. Aim: To identify and develop the stages of the surgical process so that they could be applied to surgery departments. Methods: A search, review and bibliographic analysis of the application of aeronautical control and safety to medical practice in general and to surgery, in particular, were carried out. Results: Surgical process comprises the perioperative period. It is composed of Preoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": hospital admission and control of preoperative studies) Operative Stage (it is divided into 3 "sub-steps": anesthetic induction, surgery, and anesthetic recovery) and Postoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": control during hospitalization and ambulatory control). Two checkpoints must be developed. Checkpoint #1 would be located between the preoperative and operative stages, and checkpoint #2 would be located between the operative and postoperative stages. Surgical factors are surgeons, instrumental and technology, anesthesiology and operating room environment. Conclusion: It is possible and necessary to develop a systematic surgical procedure. Its application in the department of surgery could optimize the results and reduce the complications and errors related to daily practice.

RESUMO Racional: A indústria aeronáutica é uma das disciplinas que mais utiliza sistemas de controle. Sua finalidade é evitar acidentes e retornar voos mais seguros. O voo de um avião, desde a decolagem até a aterrissagem, é processo dividido em etapas com estrito controle. Um procedimento cirúrgico tem as mesmas características. Tentar identificar e desenvolver etapas no processo cirúrgico, utilizando a experiência da indústria aeronáutica, poderá otimizar os resultados e reduzir as complicações cirúrgicas. Objetivo: Identificar e desenvolver etapas no processo cirúrgico para que possam ser aplicadas nos serviços de cirurgia. Métodos: Foram realizadas pesquisas, revisão e análise bibliográfica sobre o controle e segurança aeronáutica e aplicando-as na prática médica em geral e à cirurgia em particular. Resultados: O processo cirúrgico compreende o período perioperatório. É composto de pré-operatório (dividido em duas sub-etapas: admissão hospitalar e controle de estudos pré-operatórios); fase operatória (dividida em três sub-etapas: indução anestésica, operação e recuperação anestésica) e fase pós-operatória (dividida em duas "sub-etapas": controle durante a hospitalização e controle ambulatorial). Dois pontos de verificação devem ser desenvolvidos. O ponto de checagem nº 1 estaria localizado entre os estágios pré-operatório e operatório, e o ponto de checagem nº 2 entre os estágios operatório e pós-operatório. Fatores cirúrgicos são cirurgiões, instrumental e tecnologia, anestesiologia e ambiente de sala de cirurgia. Conclusão: É possível e necessário desenvolver um procedimento cirúrgico sistemático. Sua aplicação no departamento de cirurgia poderia otimizar os resultados e reduzir as complicações e erros relacionados à prática diária.

Herramienta de evaluación del paciente con dolor posoperatorio / Evaluation tool for patients with postoperative pain

Introducción: El dolor es una experiencia sensorial y emocional desagradable asociada con daño hístico. Objetivo: Evaluar una herramienta para la valoración del dolor posoperatorio en pacientes con intervenciones quirúrgicas electivas. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación de innovación tecnológica por tratarse de la construcción y validación de un instrumento de medición, en el Hospital Universitario Docente Manuel Ascunce Domenech, de octubre de 2015 a enero de 2018. El estudio se realizó en dos fases, la primera referida a la construcción del instrumento y la segunda relacionada con la validación de este. Resultados: Los coeficientes de correlación más altos fueron: expresión facial, tono muscular y presión arterial sistólica. A partir de este análisis quedó conformado el instrumento definitivo con igual número de partes. Para evaluar la confiabilidad de la escala se empleó el test en paralelo, que tuvo como resultado un coeficiente de correlación lineal de Pearson de 0,945 con un intervalo de confianza de 95 por ciento de 0,93 a 0,97 entre los puntajes obtenidos en una y otra aplicación. En el análisis de la consistencia interna se utilizó el coeficiente alpha de Cronbach, que obtuvo un valor de 0,753. Se exploró la validez de apariencia mediante consulta a expertos, los que consideraron que los ítems contenidos en la escala fueron bien construidos. Conclusiones: El tiempo promedio requerido para aplicar el instrumento fue de 10 min. La escala no necesita de condiciones particulares para el proceso de evaluación. Por estas razones se considera que se construyó un instrumento adecuado, útil y factible para aplicarlo por personal calificado(AU)

Introduction: Pain is an unpleasant, sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage. Objective: To evaluate a tool for the assessment of postoperative pain in patients with elective surgeries. Methods: A technological innovation research was carried out for the construction and validation of a measuring instrument at Manuel Ascunce Domenech Teaching University Hospital, from October 2015 to January 2018. The study was carried out in two phases: the first refers to the construction of the instrument and the second related to the validation of this. Results: The highest correlation coefficients were: facial expression, muscle tone and systolic blood pressure. From this analysis, the definitive instrument with the same number of parts was formed. To evaluate the reliability of the scale, the parallel test was used, which resulted in a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.945 with a 95 percent confidence interval from 0.93 to 0.97 between the scores obtained in one and another use. In the internal consistency analysis, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was used, which obtained a value of 0.753. The appearance validity was explored by consulting experts, who considered that the items contained in the scale were well constructed. Conclusions: The average time required to apply the instrument was 10 min. The scale does not need particular conditions for the evaluation process. For these reasons, it is considered that an adequate, useful and feasible instrument was built to be used by qualified personnel(AU)

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol versus conventional perioperative care in colorectal surgery: a single center cohort study / Aceleração da recuperação após protocolo cirúrgico versus cuidados perioperatórios convencionais em cirurgia colorretal: um estudo de coorte em centro único

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols consist of a set of perioperative measures aimed at improving patient recovery and decreasing length of stay and postoperative complications. We assess the implementation and outcomes of an ERAS program for colorectal surgery. Methods Single center observational study. Data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery during 2 time periods, 3 years before (Pre-ERAS) and 2 years after (Post-ERAS) the implementation of an ERAS protocol. Baseline characteristics of both groups were compared. The primary outcome was the number of patients with 180 days follow-up with moderate or severe complications; secondary outcomes were postoperative length of stay, and specific complications. Data were extracted from patient records. Results There were 360 patients in the Pre-ERAS group and 319 patients in the Post-ERAS Group. 214 (59.8%) patients developed at least one complication in the pre ERAS group, versus 163 patients in the Post-ERAS group (51.10%). More patients in the Pre-ERAS group developed moderate or severe complications (31.9% vs. 22.26%, p = 0.009); and severe complications (15.5% vs. 5.3%; p < 0.0001). The median length of stay was 13 (17) days in Pre-ERAS Group and 11 (10) days in the Post-ERAS Group (p = 0.034). No differences were found on mortality rates (4.7% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.154), or readmission (6.39% vs. 4.39%; p = 0.31). Overall ERAS protocol compliance in the Post-ERAS cohort was 88%. Conclusions The implementation of ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery was associated with a significantly reduction of postoperative complications and length of stay.

Resumo Justificativa O protocolo ERAS - do Inglês Enhanced Recovery After Surgery - consiste em um conjunto de medidas perioperatórias destinadas a melhorar a recuperação do paciente e diminuir o tempo de internação e as complicações pós-operatórias. Avaliamos a implantação e os resultados de um protocolo ERAS para cirurgia colorretal. Métodos Estudo observacional em centro único. Os dados foram coletados de pacientes consecutivos submetidos à cirurgia colorretal aberta ou laparoscópica durante dois períodos: três anos antes (pré-ERAS) e dois anos após (pós-ERAS) a implantação de um protocolo ERAS. As características basais de ambos os grupos foram comparadas. O desfecho primário foi o número de pacientes com 180 dias de acompanhamento com complicações moderadas ou graves. Os desfechos secundários foram tempo de internação pós-cirurgia e complicações específicas. Os dados foram extraídos de prontuários dos pacientes. Resultados O grupo pré-ERAS foi composto por 360 pacientes e o grupo pós-ERAS por 319. No grupo pré ERAS, 214 pacientes (59,8%) desenvolveram pelo menos uma complicação versus 163 (51,10%) no grupo pós-ERAS. Um número maior de pacientes do grupo pré-ERAS desenvolveu complicações moderadas ou graves (31,9% vs. 22,26%, p = 0,009); e complicações graves (15,5% vs. 5,3%; p < 0,0001). A mediana do tempo de internação foi de 13 (17) dias no grupo pré-ERAS e de 11 (10) dias no grupo pós-ERAS (p = 0,034). Não houve diferença nas taxas de mortalidade (4,7% vs. 2,5%; p = 0,1554) ou de reinternação (6,39% vs. 4,39%; p = 0,31). A conformidade geral do protocolo ERAS na coorte pós-ERAS foi de 88%. Conclusões A implantação do protocolo ERAS para cirurgia colorretal foi associada a uma redução significativa das complicações pós-operatórias e do tempo de internação.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without renorrhaphy during open partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

ABSTRACT Purpose: Renorrhaphy in partial nephrectomy may damage intraparenchymal vessels and compress the renal parenchyma, which may lead to the formation of renal artery pseudoaneurysms or vascularized parenchymal volume reduction. Using propensity score matching, we compared surgical outcomes following non-renorrhaphy and renorrhaphy techniques for open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for T1a renal tumors. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 159 patients with normal contralateral kidneys who underwent OPN for T1a renal tumors and pre- and postoperative enhanced computed tomography between 2012 and 2015. Patient variables were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching between the two Groups: renorrhaphy (inner and outer layer sutures) and non-renorrhaphy (inner layer sutures only). Postoperative complications and renal function were compared between the two groups. Results: We matched 43 patients per Group. Operative time, estimated blood loss, cold ischemic time, and postoperative hospital stay were not significantly different between the two Groups. Urine leakage (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 0 renorrhaphy cases and 2 non-renorrhaphy cases (0% versus 4.6%, P=0.49). Renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) occurred in 6 renorrhaphy cases and in 0 non-renorrhaphy cases (13% versus 0%, P=0.02). Conclusions: The non-renorrhaphy technique may result in a lower risk of RAP but a greater risk of urine leakage. This technique needs further refinement to become a standard procedure for OPN.

Manejo perioperatório dos novos anticoagulantes orais / Perioperative management of new oral anticoagulants

Os novos anticoagulantes orais revolucionaram a terapia de anticoagulação ao propiciar maior comodidade posológica e utilizar doses fixas, sem necessidade de acompanhamento do efeito com séries de exames laboratoriais e com menor risco de interações medicamentosas e alimentares. Porém, por serem medicamentos relativamente novos na prática clínica e, até recentemente, não existirem antídotos específicos para a reversão do seu efeito, o manejo no contexto perioperatório sempre gerou certo receio e questionamentos. O manejo adequado dos novos anticoagulantes no perioperatório envolve a avaliação cuidadosa do risco de tromboembolismo a que o paciente está sujeito na eventualidade da suspensão desses agentes em comparação com o risco de sangramento associado à manutenção; essa avaliação precisa abordar a susceptibilidade tanto de fatores relacionados com o paciente quanto do próprio tipo da cirurgia. Publicações recentes conseguiram reunir as evidências mais atuais que norteiam as estratégias de manejo desses medicamentos na eventualidade de um procedimento cirúrgico

The new oral anticoagulants have revolutionized anticoagulant therapy by providing greater dosage convenience, using fixed doses, without the need to monitor the effect with series of laboratory tests, and with a lower risk of drug and food interactions. However, because they are relatively new medications in clinical practice, and because until recently they did not have specific antidotes to reverse their effect, their handling in the perioperative context has always generated a certain fear and questioning. The proper management of the new anticoagulants in the perioperative period involves a careful evaluation of the thromboembolic risk to which the patient is subject in the event of suspension of these agents, compared with the risk of bleeding associated with their maintenance; this evaluation must address the susceptibility of both patient-related factors and the type of surgery. Recent publications have been able to gather the most recent evidence, which guides the strategies for handling these drugs in the event of a surgical procedure

Agreement between three perioperative risk scores / Concordância entre três escores de risco perioperatório

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the agreement between the three scores proposed by the II Guideline for Perioperative Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC): the American College of Physicians algorithm (ACP), the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Evaluation (EMAPO) and Lee’s Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI). Method: Patients evaluated preoperatively for non-cardiac surgery by the anesthesiology service were classified as low, moderate or high-risk according to the 3 algorithms suggested by the II Guideline. To calculate the strength of agreement between the scores, the kappa agreement index was used. Results: Four hundred and one patients were included in the sample. Cohen’s kappa inter-rater agreement between scores was 0.270 (CI: 0.222 to 0.318), corresponding to a weak agreement. Analyzing in pairs, the best correlation was between EMAPO and ACP, with kappa = 0.327. Lee’s score was the one that classified more patients as low-risk: 98.3%, while EMAPO and ACP classified as low risk 91.3% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion: There is poor correlation among the risk scores proposed by the II Perioperative Evaluation Guideline of the SBC.

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a concordância entre os três escores propostos pela II Diretriz de Avaliação Perioperatória da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC): algoritmo do American College of Physicians (ACP), Estudo Multicêntrico de Avaliação Perioperatória (Emapo) e Índice de Risco Cardíaco Revisado de Lee (IRCR). Método: pacientes avaliados no pré-operatório para cirurgia não cardíaca em serviço de anestesiologia foram classificados em baixo, moderado ou alto risco pelas três escalas sugeridas pela II Diretriz. Para avaliar o grau de concordância entre as classificações, calculou-se o índice de concordância kappa. Resultados: quatrocentos e um pacientes foram incluídos. O índice kappa de Cohen de concordância entre os três escores foi de 0,270 (IC: 0,222-0,318), correspondendo a uma concordância fraca. Analisando aos pares, a melhor correlação foi entre Emapo e ACP, com kappa de 0,327. O escore de Lee foi o que classificou mais pacientes como baixo risco: 98,3%, ao passo que Emapo e ACP classificaram como baixo risco 91,3 e 92,5%, respectivamente. Conclusão: há uma baixa concordância entre os escores de risco propostos pela II Diretriz de Avaliação Perioperatória da SBC.

Anestesia y manejo peri-operatorio del paciente quemado / Anesthesia and perioperative handling of burned patients / Anestesia e manejo perioperatório do paciente queimado

Introducción: Los pacientes quemados son un reto para el anestesiólogo, el cirujano plástico y el médico general, quien es el primer implicado en su atención. El manejo especializado y cuidadoso de los pacientes mejora su morbi- lidad y disminuye su mortalidad. Objetivo: El articulo revisa los retos que enfrenta el anestesiólogo en el paciente con quemaduras como la dificultad para el monitoreo, la vía aérea difícil, las grandes pérdidas sanguíneas, el manejo del dolor y el trabajo en equipo. Se hace una actualización de la literatura y se presenta la experiencia de la Unidad de quemados del Hospital Simón Bolívar de Bogotá. Método: Se hizo una búsqueda bibliográfica no sistemática de la literatura actual en las bases de datos de Pubmed, Lilacs y Bireme y se consultaron las estadísticas del servicio de quemados del Hospital. Resultados: Se presentan los datos estadísticos de los últimos 20 años del servicio y se desarrolla el contenido de la revisión en varios apartes incluyendo fisiopatología, resucitación inicial, monitoreo, manejo intraoperatorio y manejo del dolor. Conclusión: El manejo anestésico y peri-operatorio del paciente quemado es un reto para el anestesiólogo, el cirujano y el médico tratante, requiriendo un conocimiento básico sobre la fisiopatología y el manejo inicial del paciente. Igualmente debemos tener las habilidades necesarias en el manejo de la vía aérea complicada y la hemorragia intra- operatoria. El manejo de estos pacientes en unidades especializadas mejora su mortalidad.

Introduction: Burned patients are a challenge for anesthe- siologists, plastic surgeon and general practitioner, who is the first involved in your care. The specialized and careful management of patients improves morbidity and mortality decreases. Objective: The article reviews the challenges facing the anesthesiologist in patients with burns as difficulty monitoring, difficult airway, large blood loss, pain management and teamwork. an update of the literature is made and the experience of the burn unit of Simon Bolivar Hospital in Bogota is presented. Method: It was a non-systematic literature search of current lite- rature in the databases PubMed, Lilacs and Bireme and service statistics burned Hospital was consulted. Results: The statistical data of the last 20 years of service are presented and the content of the review is carried out in several asides including pathophysiology, initial resus- citation, monitoring, intraoperative management and pain management. Conclusion: The anesthetic manage- ment and perioperative burn patient is a challenge for the anesthesiologist, surgeon and physician, requiring a basic understanding of the pathophysiology and initial mana- gement of the patient. We must also have the necessary skills in handling the difficult airway and intra-operative bleeding. The management of these patients in specia- lized units improves mortality.

Introdução: Os pacientes queimados são um grande desafio para o anestesista, o cirurgião plástico e o médico geral, primeiro em fazer o atendimento. O manejo especializado e cuidadoso dos pacientes melhora a morbilidade e diminui a mortalidade. Objetivo: O artigo faz uma revisão dos desafios que enfrenta o anestesista no atendimento do paciente com queimaduras, tais como a dificuldade para o controle, a difícil via aérea, as grandes perdas sanguíneas, alivio da dor e trabalho em equipe. Apresenta-se uma atualização na literatura a este respeito e se descreve a experiência da Unidade de Queimados do Hospital Simón Bolivar de Bogotá. Método: Realizou-se a busca bibliográfica da literatura atualizada nas seguintes bases de dados: Pubmed, Lilacs e Bireme, além disso foram consultadas as estadísticas do serviço de queimados do mencionado Hospital em Bogotá. Resultado: Apresentam-se dados estadísticos dos últimos vinte anos do serviço, como também a literatura incluindo fisiopatologia, ressuscitação inicial, monito-reio, manejo intraoperatório e alivio da dor. Conclusão: O manejo anestésico e perioperatório do paciente com queimaduras nas unidades especializadas é importante para diminuir mortalidade. A apresenta grandes desafios o manejo inicial do paciente para o anestesista, cirurgião e médico tratante, pois requer conhecimentos básicos da fisiopatologia e manejo inicial do paciente. Especial-mente cuidadoso deve ser o manejo da via aérea difícil e hemorragia intra operatória.

Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results

ABSTRACTObjectives:To evaluate the differences of peri-operatory and oncological outcomes between Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Open Radical Cystectomy in our center.Materials and Methods:Overall, 50 patients were included in this non randomized match-pair analysis: 25 patients who had undergone Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (Group-1) and 25 patients with similar characteristics who had undergone Open Radical Cystectomy (Group-2). The patients were operated from January 2005 to December 2012 in a single Institution.Results:Mean operative time for groups 1 and 2 were 350 and 280 minutes (p=0.03) respectively. Mean blood loss was 330 mL for group 1 and 580 mL for group 2 (p=0.04). Intraoperative transfusion rate was 0% and 36% for groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.005). Perioperative complication rate was similar between groups. Mean time to oral intake was 2 days for group 1 and 3 days for group 2 (p=0.08). Median hospital stay was 7 days for group 1 and 13 for group 2 (p=0.04). There were no differences in positive surgical margins and overall survival, between groups.Conclusions:In a reference center with pelvic laparoscopic expertise, Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy may be considered a safe procedure with similar complication rate of Open Radical Cystectomy. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy is more time consuming, with reduced bleeding and transfusion rate. Hospital stay seems to be shorter. Oncologically no difference was observed in our mid-term follow-up.

Perioperative management of anticoagulant users scheduled for glaucoma surgery: a survey among the Brazilian Glaucoma Society members / Condução de pacientes usuários de anticoagulantes no perioperatório de cirurgia antiglaucomatosa: uma pesquisa entre os membros da Sociedade Brasileira de Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate and describe, among the members of the Brazilian Glaucoma Society (BGS), the practices regarding the perioperative management of anticoagulants (warfarin and aspirin) use in patients scheduled for glaucoma surgery. METHODS: The active members of the Brazilian Glaucoma Society answered a questionnaire evaluating different aspects of their current perioperative management of glaucomatous patients taking warfarin or aspirin. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants returned a complete questionnaire. Warfarin or aspirin was routinely interrupted prior to glaucoma surgery by 82.7% of the respondents. The majority of the surgeons who discontinued these medications reported doing so 7 days prior to surgery and resumed their use the day after the procedure. Almost half of our interviewees reported hemorrhagic complications that could be related to anticoagulant therapy. A large number of the surgeons (86.5%) preferred a particular surgical technique for anticoagulated patients; however, most of them (88.5%) do not change the anesthetic planning in such patients. Finally, the majority of the participants (90.4%) refer their anticoagulated patients to a preoperative appointment with a cardiologist or a general practitioner before the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Brazilian Glaucoma Society members participating in this study interrupt either warfarin or aspirin prior to glaucoma surgery. Although there is scant information available in the literature to offer definitive guidance, most participants from the Brazilian Glaucoma Society seem to share the same opinion when it comes to perioperative management of anticoagulant users.

OBJETIVO: Investigar e descrever, entre os membros da Sociedade Brasileira de Glaucoma (SBG), as práticas relativas ao manejo de anticoagulantes (varfarina e aspirina) em pacientes agendados para cirurgia antiglaucomatosa. MÉTODOS: Foi enviado um questionário objetivo aos membros ativos da Sociedade Brasileira de Glaucoma avaliando diferentes aspectos da forma como conduzem seus pacientes em uso de varfarina ou aspirina durante o período perioperatório de uma cirurgia antiglaucomatosa. RESULTADOS: Cinquenta e dois participantes retornaram o questionário preenchido adequadamente. O uso de varfarina ou aspirina foi rotineiramente interrompido antes da cirurgia antiglaucomatosa por 82,7% dos entrevistados. A maior parte dos cirurgiões, quando interromperam o uso destes medicamentos, o fez sete dias antes da cirurgia e os reintroduziram no dia seguinte ao procedimento. Aproximadamente metade dos entrevistados disse ter observado complicações hemorrágicas que poderiam ser relacionados à terapia anticoagulante. Embora a maioria dos cirurgiões (86,5%) referiu utilizar alguma técnica cirúrgica em particular para esses pacientes anticoagulados, quase todos (88,5%) não alteram seu planejamento anestésico de rotina nesses mesmos casos. Finalmente, a maior parte dos participantes (90,4%) relatou referir seus pacientes anticoagulados para uma avaliação pré-operatória com um cardiologista ou um clínico geral. CONCLUSÃO: A maior parte dos membros da Sociedade Brasileira de Glaucoma que participou desse estudo refere interromper o uso de anticoagulantes (varfarina ou aspirina) antes de uma cirurgia antiglaucomatosa. Embora existam poucas informações disponíveis na literatura para oferecer uma orientação definitiva, a maioria dos participantes parece compartilhar da mesma opinião quando se trata do manejo perioperatório de anticoagulantes.

Magnets and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: What's the problem.

A growing number of surgical patients present to the operating room with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Peri-operative care of these patients dictates that ICD function be suspended for many surgical procedures to avoid inappropriate, and possibly harmful, ICD therapy triggered by electromagnetic interference (EMI). An alternative to reprogramming the ICD is the use of a magnet to temporarily suspend its function. However, this approach is not without complications. We report a case where magnet use failed to inhibit ICD sensing of EMI, and a shock was delivered to the patient. Measures to decrease EMI, controversies regarding magnet use, and expert recommendations are discussed.

Management of a patient with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis requiring coronary artery bypass grafts.

Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (HPP) is an autosomal-dominant inherited muscle disease characterized by episodes of flaccid weakness and intermittent myotonia. There are no previous reports in the literature about anesthesia for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in this disorder. We describe perioperative anesthetic management for on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a 75-year-old man with a history of hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. This case report outlines our management strategy and the issues encountered during the perioperative period.

Manejo perioperatorio de la anticoagulación en pacientes tratados crónicamente con warfarina (con énfasis en la sustitución ambulatoria con heparinas de bajo peso molecular) / Perioperative management of long-term warfarin anticoagulated patients (focused on outpatient bridging with low molecular weight heparins)

El manejo de la anticoagulación perioperatoria en pacientes tratados crónicamentecon warfarina es un problema clínico frecuente y de difícil manejo. La suspensiónde la anticoagulación durante un procedimiento podría poner en riesgo de eventostromboembólicos y continuarla podría generar sangrado excesivo. La evidenciaal respecto es limitada y las guías por consenso de expertos son inconsistentes.La ausencia de esquemas de manejo claros y el uso indiscriminado de reemplazotransitorio con heparina no fraccionada genera demoras, sobrecostos y díasde hospitalización innecesarios. En el presente texto se discuten las posiblesvariables y riesgos a considerar en la toma de decisiones y se revisa la evidenciaconcerniente al uso de heparinas de bajo peso molecular para la sustitucióntransitoria y ambulatoria de la anticoagulación en el perioperatorio; además, seproponen una guía de recomendaciones y un algoritmo novedoso y sencillo, quefacilite su implementación...

Management of patients under chronic coumadin anticoagulation on the perioperative setting is a frequent and problematic clinical scenario. Temporary interruption of anticoagulation during surgical procedures places the patients at risk of thrombo-embolic events and on the other hand, keeping anticoagulation throughout surgery puts them at risk of bleeding complications. There is limited evidence in this topic and clinical guidelines based on expert opinion are inconsistent. The lack of clear guidelines and the indiscriminate use of unfractionated heparin for transitional replacement generate delays, extra costs and is cause of unnecessary days of hospitalization. This text discusses the possible variables and risks to consider in decision making and also the evidence in regards to low molecular weight heparins for transitional and perioperative outpatient replacement of anticoagulation called “bridging”. A practical guideline and a simple algorithm are proposed in order to facilitate its implementation...